I sadly missed the lecture by the world renowned economist and public intellectual Joseph Stiglitz at Wits. I wish I could have been there, it was an unavoidable tragedy of life I guess! Who knows whether I will ever be able to see the man alive, anyway…
So I was fortunate enough to listen to Dr. Mamphela Ramphela expounding on the Dinokeng Scenarios. For the uninitiated, the Dinokeng Scenarios are a set of possible scenarios that predict the future of South Africa by 2020. It is a work of team of that comprises 35 leaders from civil society and government, political parties, business, public administration, trade unions, religious groups, academia and the media. The initiative is being sponsored by Old Mutual and Nedbank
I had the privilege of talking to one of the dedicated organisers of this initiative; Bra. Ish Mkhabela, just before the presentation started. He passionately explained to me how they have been hard at work, identifying this diverse group of notable individuals who could add value to the scenario planning process that brought about what is now known as the Dinokeng Scenarios.
Dinokeng is the name of the town where the team met to develop their scenarios, it is a Sotho word that means “a place of rivers”, an apt metaphor of the process which could signify a meeting of rivers of thoughts.
The team was brought together by six convenors, all of whom are actively engaged in our national issues according to the website. They are Dr Mamphela Ramphele, who chairs the convenor group, Archbishop Njongonkulu Ndungane, Mr Bob Head, Ms Graça Machel, Dr Vincent Maphai and Mr Rick Menell.
In a nutshell, Dr. Ramphele outlined the three possible future scenarios that South Africa could possibly find itself in by 2020;
1. Walk Apart : (Doom and Gloom - in this scenario, by 2020 we will have a corrupt and ineffective state with a distrusting and self protective citizenry that is disengaged)
2. Walk Behind ( Not So Lekker – in this scenario we have an interventionist and directive state with a compliant and dependent while still disengaged. In this scenario the party “rules” as opposed to “governing”.)
3. Walk together (Ideal state – in this scenario we have a collaborative and enabling state which has a vibrant and engaged citizenry)
My impression is that these scenarios are both powerful and a perfect start to initiate an honest debate within South Africa concerning its current state. South Africa is currently in the “Walk Apart” scenario; despite what the ANC would have us believe, we have a collapsing state machinery which has been unable to deliver on its mandate to the public. We have a citizenry that is led by party activists who determine policy. Sections of the population feel left out of the political process and politicians are not accountable.
However I do worry about the fact that the Dinokeng Scenario process could end at this point without it being internalised by all South Africans. I also fear that it may be construed to be elitist if it does not reach far enough. The composition of the team should be enlarged to include more community based leaders which in my opinion will be instrumental to the wider acceptance of the ideas. I am aware of the difficulty of getting everyone involved from the onset; however we should never fail to try.
This document is by no means an authoritative manual about the state of South Africa, I regard it as a very honest shot at it. I therefore embrace it, its observations ring true and I am sure the leaders of this country are being made aware that the citizenry is still optimistic, it wants to be involved, and it is currently not happy with the current state of affairs.
Quick Reviews: Ndumiso Ngcobo
-
Some of my best friends are white (Ndumiso Ngcobo)Inexplicably, my mother gave this book to me for Christmas a year or two ago. And what a great surprise it ...
1 week ago
